{"id":798,"date":"2009-03-26T16:26:32","date_gmt":"2009-03-26T21:26:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/forthelost.wordpress.com\/?p=798"},"modified":"2023-01-27T17:15:23","modified_gmt":"2023-01-27T21:15:23","slug":"ncmec-and-a-wording-change-that-wont-be-done-here","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.forthelost.org\/blog\/2009\/03\/26\/ncmec-and-a-wording-change-that-wont-be-done-here\/","title":{"rendered":"NCMEC and a wording change that won&#8217;t be done here"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.missingkids.com\">NCMEC<\/a> has recently changed the wording on their family abduction cases, from &#8220;abducted by non-custodial (relative)&#8221; to &#8220;allegedly abducted by (relative).&#8221; If it said &#8220;in the company of non-custodial (relative)&#8221; it now has removed the non-custodial bit. It&#8217;s a change I can understand. Defenders of parental abductors can get vehement, and I suspect this was related to lawsuit threats.<\/p>\n<p>Doesn&#8217;t mean I like it, however. I don&#8217;t. I will continue to use &#8220;non-custodial&#8221; on the For the Lost site. If I find out there was no abduction, I&#8217;ll say that. However, I think that wording NCMEC has now takes away from the cases, as ninety-nine percent of the time there is no doubt whatsoever an abduction by a parent occured.<\/p>\n<p>Go ahead, try to sue me for it. When your lawsuit gets dismissed (when, not if) I will countersue and you will be sorry. You have been warned.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NCMEC has recently changed the wording on their family abduction cases, from &#8220;abducted by non-custodial (relative)&#8221; to &#8220;allegedly abducted by (relative).&#8221; If it said &#8220;in the company of non-custodial (relative)&#8221; it now has removed the non-custodial bit. It&#8217;s a change I can understand. Defenders of parental abductors can get vehement, and I suspect this was [&hellip;]<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,17,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-798","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-family-abductions","category-opinion","category-website-notes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forthelost.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forthelost.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forthelost.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forthelost.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forthelost.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=798"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.forthelost.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30019,"href":"https:\/\/www.forthelost.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798\/revisions\/30019"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forthelost.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=798"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forthelost.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=798"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forthelost.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}